![veritas-splendor:
thedailywhat:
Misquote of the Day: Yeah, so, um… that’s not a compliment.
[reddit.]
The fact that a show on prime time TV can say this will no reaction from the media is a little upsetting.
As for the argument at hand, the show is simply continuing the misunderstanding that faith and reason are at odds, and one cannot be in existence as long as the other is. This is, plainly put, false. Reason and religion need each other in order to survive. As a religious person myself, I like to believe I am quite reasonable and well studied, to say otherwise is insulting. I would go on now about the proof that reason and faith go hand in hand but for the moment I would like to point out the Church’s opinion on faith and reason as stated by Pope John Paul II in my description.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsm1hqo2kw1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg)
Misquote of the Day: Yeah, so, um… that’s not a compliment.
[reddit.]
The fact that a show on prime time TV can say this will no reaction from the media is a little upsetting.
As for the argument at hand, the show is simply continuing the misunderstanding that faith and reason are at odds, and one cannot be in existence as long as the other is. This is, plainly put, false. Reason and religion need each other in order to survive. As a religious person myself, I like to believe I am quite reasonable and well studied, to say otherwise is insulting. I would go on now about the proof that reason and faith go hand in hand but for the moment I would like to point out the Church’s opinion on faith and reason as stated by Pope John Paul II in my description.
i go out with shorts on and to impress my stefanny, but i still dont believe this chart is accurate. Shaving my legs would most likely be a turn off.
(Source: miss-scarlet-red, via fannyann)
I want to be this for Halloween: Lady Luck.
Look at this awesome glittery top hat! And the bow tie!
Kenny approves!
COURTNEY STONE JUST GOT ENGAGED!!!! ….. so many mistakes, so little time.
Three guys walk into a bar… third one should’ve ducked.
Boom.
Due to the recent rival of the topic of abortion in popular discussion, I feel I should pose an argument against the rationality of the law concerning abortion.
Alrights just to put this out there, yes I am Catholic but I am telling yall this on a strictly reason based argument. Though chances are people will dismiss this as the comment of an outdated religious view. If ya find in my argument where I incorporate religious views let me know so I can clear up the confusion. Enough rambling, time to make it short and sweet.
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 states that a, “child in utero,” (that is an unborn child) is protected under state law. Thus if someone kills a pregnant woman (in most states this starts at fertilization), then they will be charged with a double homicide. Yet if a woman chooses to have the same person (the child) removed (killed) from herself she is not brought up on charges of homicide. Where is the logic here?
Also just to prove this is not just the argument of a man from Texas, “By a vote of 6-1, the California Supreme Court on April 5 upheld a murder conviction of a man who shot a pregnant woman to death, and then argued that he had not known she was pregnant.” The man, “Harold Taylor was convicted of two counts of murder in the 1999 shooting deaths of Patty Fensler and her 11-week to 13-week-old unborn child.”
Thus one of the most liberal states, and conservative states agree that an unborn child is protected under the law, and yet, abortion remains legal.
It just doesn’t follow reason.
P.S. Sorry I lied bout the short and sweet bit.
just saw a couple limos black suvs and a police escort. Some one is big ballin
got off work a little early spent the next 15 min lookin for my keys said a little prayer and found them within 5 sec. god loves me :D